In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is same performance as the Core i3-10105. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $109 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 81% cheaper – $25.00 vs $134.06
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.61/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10105
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Core i3-10105: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.06
18%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
