In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2650L. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 51 vs 70 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2650L
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100 vs Xeon E5-2650L: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2650L
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
92%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100 vs Xeon E5-2650L in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100 vs Xeon E5-2650L in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2650L
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2650L Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011 |
51W | Power Consumption | 70W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
