Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $47.46 vs $273.18
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-14700F - $0.20 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-7100 - 287 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $47.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 672 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
21%
Price, $
$273.18
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 671 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |