In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-430M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i5-430M
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100 vs Core i5-430M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100 vs Core i5-430M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100 vs Core i5-430M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 51 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
