The Core i3-6300 is a faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $33.77 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-6300
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 31% cheaper – $74.93 vs $108.70
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i3-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$108.7
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
69%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
98%
Min 1% FPS
119
98%
Price, $
$74.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core i3-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
