Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Core i3-6300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $108.70 vs $416.96
- Up to 69% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900KF - $0.62 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Core i3-6300 - 206 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
176
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7387 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
31%
Price, $
$416.96
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7387 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6300 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |