In Deathloop, the Core i3-6300 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $75 cheaper!
Core i3-6300
- Up to 50% cheaper – $74.14 vs $149.35
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in Deathloop – $0.34 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 51 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-6300 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
$74.14
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
49%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
52%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6300 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6300 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6300 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
