In Rust, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Xeon X5550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-6100
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 218 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5550
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Xeon X5550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon X5550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon X5550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon X5550
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5550 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
