In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-6100
- Is 6 years and 22 days newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 6 years and 22 days newer
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
229 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
95%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
