In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Xeon L5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-6100
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 51 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon L5640
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Xeon L5640: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
90%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon L5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Xeon L5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon L5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon L5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
