Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $57.40 vs $93.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.47 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-6100 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $57.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |