In Rust, the Core i3-6100 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 51 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 28% faster in Rust – 280 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
219 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
55%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
