In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-6100 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $681 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper – $70.65 vs $751.89
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.03 vs $5.48/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 51 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 66% less energy
Core i9-13900KS
- Up to 101% faster in Battlefield 6 – 137 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 101% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 12, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
68 FPS
50%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
50%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
137 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$751.89
9%
Value, $/FPS
$5.48/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS Jan 12th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
