In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $478 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 180 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 87% cheaper – $70.65 vs $548.89
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.39 vs $3.22/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
94%
Price, $
$548.89
12%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
