In Control, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $349 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 83% cheaper – $70.65 vs $419.97
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Control – $0.28 vs $1.65/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i9-12900
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 253 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-12900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
248 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
98%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
253 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$419.97
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-12900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i9-12900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $519.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
