In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-6100
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
229 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
95%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 51 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
