In Rust, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $49 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 41% cheaper – $70.65 vs $119.99
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Rust – $0.32 vs $0.53/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
89%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
58%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
