In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-6100 is slightly faster than the Core i5-7500T and it's also a better value for money, as it's $60 cheaper!
Core i3-6100
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6
- Up to 46% cheaper – $70.65 vs $130.43
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.02 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i5-7500T
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
69 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
68 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.43
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 51 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
