In F1 22, the Core i3-6100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $3 more expensive!
Core i3-6100
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 51 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 30% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 4% faster in F1 22 – 374 vs 360 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in F1 22
- Up to 4% cheaper – $67.59 vs $70.65
- Up to 4% cheaper
- Up to 5% better value in F1 22 – $0.18 vs $0.19/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in F1 22
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
360 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
247 FPS
98%
Price, $
$70.65
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
95%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
374 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
253 FPS
100%
Price, $
$67.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6100 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
51W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
