Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Core i3-560
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $60.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - $0.36 vs $4.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-560 - 206 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |