The Core i3-560 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $19.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-560
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 22% cheaper – $70.00 vs $89.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-560
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |