In Deathloop, the Core i3-550 is same performance as the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-550
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer – May 30, 2010 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 73 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 9% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-550 vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-550 vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-550 vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1366 |
73W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
