In Deathloop, the Core i3-550 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-550
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 55 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
92%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-550 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
21%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
