In Rust, the Core i3-550 is slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $157 cheaper!
Core i3-550
- Up to 55% cheaper – $129.94 vs $286.95
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Rust – $0.62 vs $1.07/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 29% faster in Rust – 268 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-550 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
48%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
268 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
83 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286.95
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-550 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-550 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
