In Deathloop, the Core i3-550 is same performance as the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-550
- Is 4 months and 21 days newer – May 30, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 months and 21 days newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-550 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-550 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-550 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
