In Deathloop, the Core i3-550 is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-550
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-550 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
97%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-550 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-550 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
