In Atomfall, the Core i3-540 is slightly slower than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-540
- Is 2 months and 6 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 2 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 73 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3565
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-540 vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
186 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
99%
Price, $
$101.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| $133.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1366 |
73W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
