In Atomfall, the Core i3-540 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $340 cheaper!
Core i3-540
- Up to 77% cheaper – $98.95 vs $438.99
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.53 vs $1.77/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-540 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
184 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
74%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$133.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
