In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-540 is faster than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $447 cheaper!
Core i3-540
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 81% cheaper – $101.55 vs $548.89
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.50 vs $3.22/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-540 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$548.89
18%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$133.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
