The Core i3-540 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $223.99 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-540
- Up to 86% cheaper – $35.00 vs $258.99
- A better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-10900F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Core i3-540 vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
13%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
16%
Core i3-540 vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-540 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$133.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |