In Atomfall, the Core i3-540 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $57 cheaper!
Core i3-540
- Up to 36% cheaper – $101.57 vs $159.00
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-540 vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
186 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
87%
Price, $
$101.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
63%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $133.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1151 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
