In Deathloop, the Core i3-540 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $100 cheaper!
Core i3-540
- Up to 50% cheaper – $98.95 vs $199.00
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Deathloop – $0.44 vs $0.87/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-540 vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
98%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
49%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
51%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
42%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$133.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1200 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
