Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3468 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Core i3-530
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $39.46 vs $93.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.24 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-530 - 190 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $39.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7193 minutes ago
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7194 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-530 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |