In Rust, the Core i3-530 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $197 cheaper!
Core i3-530
- Up to 80% cheaper – $49.98 vs $247.30
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $1.06/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 12% faster in Rust – 232 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-530 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
68%
Price, $
$49.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-530 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$113.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
