In Atomfall, the Core i3-530 is slightly slower than the Core i7-930. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $256 cheaper!
Core i3-530
- Up to 83% cheaper – $51.07 vs $307.29
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall – $0.27 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 73 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer – Feb 28, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-530 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
186 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
99%
Price, $
$51.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-530 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $113.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1366 |
73 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
