In Atomfall, the Core i3-530 is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-530
No clear advantages
Core i7-620M
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-530 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
185 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
99%
Price, $
$51.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-530 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-530 Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$113.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
