In Atomfall, the Core i3-5020U is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5020U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 15 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-620M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-5020U vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5020U vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5020U vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5020U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5020U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
