In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-5015U is slightly slower than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5015U
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-5015U vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5015U vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5015U vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5015U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5015U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| $275.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
