In Atomfall, the Core i3-5015U is slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-5015U vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5015U vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5015U vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5015U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5015U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$275.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
