In War Thunder, the Core i3-5010U is slightly faster than the Xeon X5650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5010U
- Up to 1% faster in War Thunder – 270 vs 268 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in War Thunder
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5650
No clear advantages
War Thunder FPS Calculator
Core i3-5010U vs Xeon X5650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5010U vs Xeon X5650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5010U vs Xeon X5650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5010U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X5650
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5010U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5650 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
