In Atomfall, the Core i3-5010U is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2690 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5010U
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2690 v2
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-5010U vs Xeon E5-2690 v2: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5010U vs Xeon E5-2690 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5010U vs Xeon E5-2690 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5010U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5010U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2690 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA2011 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
