In F1 24, the Core i3-4370 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 43% faster in F1 24 – 213 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in F1 24
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4370
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4370 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
