In Atomfall, the Core i3-4370 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4370
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4370 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
