In Control, the Core i3-4370 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 250 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4370
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4370 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
