In Control, the Core i3-4370 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 251 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4370 vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4370 vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4370
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4370 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
