In Atomfall, the Core i3-4330 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $178 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 51% cheaper – $169.95 vs $347.55
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall – $0.84 vs $1.41/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
82%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$347.55
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
