In Control, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $229 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 57% cheaper – $169.95 vs $399.00
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Control – $0.68 vs $1.60/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
247 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
42%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
