In Rust, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $30 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 15% cheaper – $169.95 vs $199.99
- Up to 15% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Rust – $0.78 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 235 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
217 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
79%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
92%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
