In Rust, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 223 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $150.12 vs $169.95
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in Rust – $0.67 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
217 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
92%
Price, $
$169.95
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
86%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
