In Atomfall, the Core i3-4330 is slower than the Core i7-13700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $342 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 67% cheaper – $169.95 vs $512.41
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.84 vs $2.10/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
83%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$512.41
33%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
